James Gunn’s Superman (2025) marks a bold new chapter in the DC Universe, blending his signature irreverent style with the timeless heroism of Clark Kent. The film has garnered a mix of praise and criticism, reflecting its ambitious scope and Gunn’s unique approach to the Man of Steel.
Superman introduces a fresh take on Clark Kent, portrayed by David Corenswet, who brings a blend of earnestness and charm to the role. The narrative delves into Superman’s internal struggles, particularly his identity as an alien in a human world, while also exploring geopolitical tensions through the fictional nations of Boravia and Jarhanpur. Some critics have drawn parallels between these conflicts and real-world issues, though Gunn maintains that the script predates recent events and was not intended as an allegory Wikipedia.
The film’s tone is a departure from darker interpretations, embracing a more colorful and earnest atmosphere. While this approach has been lauded for its heart and optimism, some viewers feel it lacks the gravitas expected from a Superman story. This Superman is portrayed as more of a human then Krytonion.
Visually, the film is a feast for the eyes (and so is David Corenswet), with vibrant cinematography and dynamic action sequences. However, some critics argue that the final act becomes overwhelmed by CGI battles, detracting from character development and emotional payoff.
At its core, Superman can explore identity, homelife, and immigrant themes. While some love these themes, others do not feel that the pacing problems and plot jamming overshadow emotional resonance. In addition, some of the character castings, such as the Hawk Girl characterisation, have come under fire for not living up to their comic book counterparts
James Gunn’s Superman (2025) offers a refreshing take on the iconic superhero, blending humor, heart, and a modern sensibility. While it may not satisfy all purists and certain conservatives, it successfully reintroduces Superman as a symbol of hope and resilience for a new generation.
